SOCIAL MEDIA AS A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY: A CASE STUDY OF TWITTER IN PAKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54690/margallapapers.26.2.117Keywords:
National Security, Securitization, Twitter, Hybrid War, FramingAbstract
Social media has evolved significantly over the years while providing strategic platforms for voices to reach billions of people within no time. Accordingly, it has advantages and disadvantages (threats). The nature of threats emanating from social media, especially Twitter, in the context of Pakistan, are mainly in the form of radicalization, glorification of terrorist groups, propagation of violent sub-nationalism and hybrid warfare. Though Pakistan has been relatively active after 2020 in responding to social media challenges, implementing social media regulations remains an issue, especially when most social media platforms are foreign in origin. This paper evaluates the interlinkage of social media and national security in the context of Pakistan while exploring how agents of insecurity and instability exploit social media and what response mechanism the state has placed to mitigate these threats. The paper is a qualitative inquiry using primary and secondary sources to answer these questions. The research findings suggest marginal securitization of social media, albeit without significant implementation.
Bibliography Entry
Al Abd, Saad. 2022. "Social Media as a Threat to National Security: A Case Study of Twitter in Pakistan." Margalla Papers 26 (2): 96-107.
References
Thierry Balzacq, “Theory of Securitization: Origins, Core Assumptions and Variants,” in Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve? Ed. Thierry Balzacq (London and New York: Routledge, 2011), 3.
Marcos Cardoso dos Santos, “Identity and Discourse in Securitisation Theory,” Contexto Internacional 40, 2 (2018): 229-230, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2018400200003.
Robert Entman, “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm,” Journal of Communication 43, (1993): 51-58.
Robert M Entman, “Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of Campaign 2008,” Journalism 11, 4 (2010): 391, DOI:10.1177/1464884910367587.
Scott Watson, “Framing the Copenhagen School: Integrating the Literature on Threat Construction,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40, 2 (2012): 301.
Stephen D. Reese, “The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited,” Journal of Communication57 (2007): 148-154, https://doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.
..............................(contd.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Saad Al Abd
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.